Grindr Accused of Illegal Return-to-Office Policy in Union Dispute

Grindr Faces Allegations of Illegal Policy

Last year, Grindr allegedly imposed a return-to-office policy that led to half of its staff being forced out, in an effort to combat a unionization push, as claimed by the US labor board. The company is accused of violating federal labor law by enforcing a strict return-to-office mandate in retaliation against workers trying to organize. The complaint, filed recently, also alleges that the company illegally refused to recognize and negotiate with the workers’ union.

Union Campaign and Company Crackdown

Grindr's return-to-office crackdown reportedly resulted in roughly 80 employees resigning, turning the company into a flashpoint amid a broader trend of getting employees back to offices across industries. The policy, which required workers to show up to offices two days a week, was seen as a heavy burden for trans employees who had to find new healthcare providers according to the labor group.

Company Response and Legal Action

Grindr did not immediately comment on the labor board's complaint and has previously denied any wrongdoing. The company had informed employees that the return-to-office plan had been in development for many months. In the absence of a settlement, an agency judge is set to consider and rule on the complaint. Grindr would have the opportunity to appeal any decision to labor board members in Washington and potentially to federal court. While the labor board can enforce policy changes and reinstatement of employees with backpay, it lacks the authority to impose punitive damages or hold executives personally liable for violations.